Josh Simon Published: 04.14.10, 00:44 / Israel Opinion
Polls have shown that almost half of Israeli Jewish high school students don’t believe that Arabs should have the same rights as Jews, and a report released recently indicates a 28% rise in racist incidents in 2009. On the other hand, moderate Arab elements within Israeli society have joined the fray. We have seen bulldozer attacks, foiled attempts by Arab citizens at abetting terrorism and glorification of Israel’s enemies. Whether Israel’s Arab citizens are being hijacked by an extreme political movement or are being pushed by a hostile majority is uncertain, but this phenomenon will certainly jeopardize the state’s internal stability.
“Coexistence Education,” according to Daniel Bar Tal, is the “process through which society members acquire the beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors that are in line with the ideas of coexistence.” Coexistence vis-à-vis Israel is defined as two geopolitical groups living together peacefully without hostility despite differences. Coexistence generally has come to represent a political process preceding integration in multicultural societies prone to conflict. Unfortunately, as Bar-Tal illustrates, the longer the process lasts in Israel, the more it will be discredited by the Arab sector as it is perceived as a means of “eternalizing Jewish dominance and discrimination over the Arab population.”
Coexistence itself does not guarantee full equality and rights which are prerequisites in modern democracies. Nonetheless, it does represent an urgent step that will one day lead to an integrated and therefore stable society. Therefore, Israel must commit to a comprehensive coexistence education policy. Such a policy would allow civil society professionals to develop a course of action that the government could later institutionalize.
Symbolic, practical steps needed
In order to initiate educational reforms, it is incumbent upon the political leadership to commit to both symbolic and practical policy measures. For example, the government takes certain actions that “recognize” the importance of issues. These are symbolic policy initiatives – like the appointment of an Arab minister, or establishing a committee that explores pedagogical methodologies for coexistence education. On the other hand, balancing the budget in the education system, the aforementioned stimulus package and actually implementing recommendations of said committee are examples of practical policy steps.
The Public Committee for Coexistence Education (a group comprised of professors and civil society professionals) was established by former Education Minister Yuli Tamir with the purpose of making informed and educated recommendations regarding coexistence education policy in Israel. When Gideon Sa’ar entered office, he decided to cease the activity of the committee. Even if the recommendations of the committee are not implemented, squashing it only closes doors unnecessarily. Reviving the public committee and its work is a nominal political move that could become a realistic policy plan. This is an example of a negative symbolic step that should be reversed in order to demonstrate that Israel is working toward creating a shared society.
The current administration must also explore cooperation opportunities between civil society and government. Municipalities and the Ministry of Education could initially “outsource” coexistence education programs to professionals in the field. For example, The Abraham Fund Initiatives works closely with the Ministry of Education and local municipalities to promote the teaching of Arabic in elementary schools throughout the country. This program has been proven by independent evaluators to combat racism and negative stereotypes amongst Jewish children. PeacePlayers International uses the game of basketball to unite and educate Arab and Jewish youth, subsidizing extracurricular sports programs that build life skills and change negative perceptions.
Although these are but two examples, any coexistence curriculum with the “mandatory” stamp from the Ministry of Education would serve as a positive indication of practical efforts by the government.
Support from the political leadership is the most important factor in easing minority-majority tensions in Israel. Without it, the system will continue to promote hatred and racism. Political acknowledgment of the importance of coexistence education followed by practical policy steps for its implementation would commence the reversal of the negative trend that plagues Israeli society. Ultimately, the future and stability of Israel depends on a shared society and the next generation must be educated accordingly.
Once upon a time. A new family moved into
ReplyDeletean exclusive neighbourhood. It so happens that this neighbourhood and surrounding neighbourhoods are cat friendly neighbourhoods. The neighbourhood was so well known for cats that it changed its name to t'cat. Now, as the story goes they brought with them a puppy because they were dog lovers. They cared so much for this dog.
They have always been lovers of dogs because
the dog would be there in their darkest hour. This really upset the cat lovers. The neighbourhood had always been a cat neighbourhood eventhough there used be dogs in the neighbourhood a long time ago. The puppy grew up to be a fine animal and faithful companion. However, this incensed the neighbours. Now, this well behaved animal started changing as the local vandals started taunting this animal with sticks and stones. In addition, a certain outsider a persian cat lover moved into the neighbourhood. This really stirred things even more as the persian cats would sneak over the fence to feast on this neighbours other pet canaries. What happen next was of course, resulted in some dead canaries.
In addition, dead cats by courtesy of the dog. Now everybody is incensed.
To add insult to injury the dog escaped the owners compound and bit several people. Of course, the dog now had to be put to sleep. The dog lover got more dogs and decided that it was time to go on a persian cat expedition. These persian cats were hiding with other cats. Inadvertently, although the dog lover tried to selectively pick out those persian cats
other cats were killed. At this stage the cat lovers want the dog lovers gone.
Moral of the Story. Why do Cats and Dogs fight? Is it because they have always been that way? or do the owners imprint their personality on these animals. What if a puppy and kitten were brought up together. Would they behave differently? Something to think about.